Accessibility navigation


A qualitative study of engagement and strategic value in UK nomination committees

Simnett, J. (2022) A qualitative study of engagement and strategic value in UK nomination committees. PhD thesis, University of Reading

[img] Text (Redacted) - Thesis
· Restricted to Repository staff only

3MB
[img] Text - Thesis
· Restricted to Repository staff only

2MB
[img] Text - Thesis Deposit Form
· Restricted to Repository staff only

6MB
[img]
Preview
Text (Redacted) - Thesis
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

3MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.48683/1926.00115736

Abstract/Summary

The revised 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code came into effect in January 2019 and both extended the remit and empowered nomination committees. The consultation for review will open in mid-2022. This is the context for this exploratory study investigating strategic value from UK nomination committees. The role of the nomination committee chair is examined to understand how they engage with committee members, both inside and outside of formal meetings, to realise strategic value to the board. Nomination committees and their chairs are the least researched committees and committee chairs. They are typically responsible for the recruitment and selection of executive and non-executive directors, succession planning and diversity. In over 80% of FTSE 350 companies, the board chair is the nomination committee chair as permitted by the UK Code. Thirty-three FTSE All Share board directors were interviewed and data was thematically analysed focussing on engagement, strategic value, future governance regulation and impact from Covid-19. Strategic value was found to be realised through a holistic interpretation which takes the broadest definition of diversity, goes deep into the organisation for succession planning and entails long-range forecasting of skills for board and committee composition. This contributes to knowledge about the dynamics of nomination committees, the committee chair role and how it can be optimised to realise strategic value to the board via an emergent model. Role theory is extended to better understand role overload by non-executive directors, role duality when the board chair is also nomination committee chair, and role conflict for the CEO on workforce engagement.

Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Thesis Supervisor:Kakabadse, A. and Morais, F.
Thesis/Report Department:Henley Business School
Identification Number/DOI:https://doi.org/10.48683/1926.00115736
Divisions:Henley Business School
ID Code:115736

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation