Accessibility navigation


Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs): stewardship talks but agency walks

Alawadi, A., Kakabadse, N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-8279, Kakabadse, A. and Zuckerbraun, S. (2024) Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs): stewardship talks but agency walks. Journal of Business Research, 178. 114672. ISSN 1873-7978

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 20 October 2025.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

482kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114672

Abstract/Summary

Although the governance of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) has attracted the interest of several academics, few studies have empirically examined how DAOs are governed. We use an exploratory, inductive approach to comprehensively examine how DAOs are currently governed and the ramifications of this. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 DAO members from a variety of sectors to identify how they arrange their voting processes, distribute collaborative decision-making, and maintain their tokens. Three themes emerge from the thematic analysis of the data: (1) voting structure, (2) proposal management, and (3) token management. Participants describe the notion of DAOs as closely aligned with stewardship philosophy, encompassing collaborative and altruistic activity toward a common purpose. However, the operations and methods implemented are more oriented toward agency viewpoints due to their reliance on incentive-based processing and are based on a lack of trust among DAO stakeholders. This study provides empirical insights into DAO governance mechanisms.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > Marketing and Reputation
ID Code:116149
Publisher:Elsevier

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation