Making sense of uncertainties: ask the right question

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
[thumbnail of making_sense_of_uncertainties-2.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gruber, A., Bulgin, C. E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4368-7386, Dorigo, W., Embury, O. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1661-7828, Formanek, M., Merchant, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-9850, Mittaz, J., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Pöppl, F., Povey, A. and Wagner, W. (2025) Making sense of uncertainties: ask the right question. Surveys in Geophysics. ISSN 1573-0956 doi: 10.1007/s10712-025-09889-5

Abstract/Summary

Earth observation data should inform decision making, but good decisions can only be made if the uncertainties in the data are taken into account. Making sense of uncertainty information can be difficult, however, because uncertainties represent the statistical spread in the observations (e.g., expressed as x +/- y), which does not relate directly to one specific use case of the data. Here, we propose a Bayesian framework to transform Earth observation product uncertainties into actionable information, i.e., estimates of how confident one can be in the occurrence of specific events of interest given the data and their uncertainty. We demonstrate this framework using two case examples: (i) monitoring drought severity based on soil moisture; and (ii) estimating coral bleaching risk based on sea surface temperature. In both cases, we show that ignoring uncertainties can easily lead to misinterpretation of the data, making any decisions based on these data unlikely to be the best course of action. The proposed framework is general and can, in principle, be applied to a wide range of applications. Doing so requires a careful dialogue between data users, to formulate meaningful use cases and decision criteria, and data producers, to provide a rigorous description of their data and its uncertainties. The next step would then be to confront the uncertainty-informed estimates of event probabilities (created by the framework proposed here) with the costs and benefits of possible courses of action in order to make the best possible decisions that maximise socioeconomic merit.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/122775
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s10712-025-09889-5
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO)
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record