Accessibility navigation


Implications of using spheroidal “cone model” CMEs in solar‐wind models

Owens, M. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-2453, Barnard, L. A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9876-4612, Verbeke, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9402-5609, McGinness, B. P. S., Turner, H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-8004, Chi, Y. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-4487, Gyeltshen, D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8411-7042 and Lockwood, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7397-2172 (2025) Implications of using spheroidal “cone model” CMEs in solar‐wind models. Space Weather, 23 (6). e2025SW004397. ISSN 1542-7390

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

2MB
[thumbnail of Cone_model_CMEs_V3.pdf] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1029/2025SW004397

Abstract/Summary

Space-weather forecasting requires advanced prediction of the arrival time and properties of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in near-Earth space. Kinematic properties of CMEs close to the Sun—such as speed, direction and angular width—are routinely estimated from coronagraph images by using three-dimensional geometric models, such as the “cone model.” These are used to characterize a time-dependent perturbation at the inner boundary of a numerical solar-wind model, normally at 0.1 AU, enabling a forecast of the CME arrival time and speed at Earth. This perturbation is typically spheroidal in shape. In this study we show that spheroidal CMEs exhibit four features inconsistent with observations that may limit the accuracy of space-weather forecasts: 1, Slow spheroidal CMEs intersect the model inner boundary for a long duration and hence resist acceleration by the ambient solar wind, producing longer transit times than observed; 2, The radial extent of a spheroidal CME is directly related to its angular width. Observations of CMEs at 1 AU do not display any relation between angular width and radial extent; 3, Fast-and-wide CMEs cannot be sufficiently decelerated by the ambient solar wind and arrive with higher speeds than observed; 4, Spheroidal CMEs show different magnitudes of interplanetary accelerations for different angular widths, contrary to observations. We show that fixing the CME duration at the inner boundary—which mimics observed CME expansion—alleviates these problems. The choice of fixed duration is a free parameter that needs to be calibrated against observations, but 8 hr works reasonably well.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
ID Code:123032
Publisher:American Geophysical Union

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation