Accessibility navigation


Inequity and food insecurity and effects on obesity and associated co-morbidities: meeting report and research priorities

Ruxton, C., Bateson, M., Garner, N., Harvey, K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-0934, Lambie-Mumford, H., Levy, L., McDonald, A., Parretti, H., Walker, A., Thies, F., Minihane, A., Fairweather-Tait, S., Woodside, J., Lovegrove, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-9455 and Corfe, B. (2025) Inequity and food insecurity and effects on obesity and associated co-morbidities: meeting report and research priorities. British Journal of Nutrition. ISSN 0007-1145 (In Press)

[thumbnail of Ruxton et al (2025).pdf] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

652kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

A Rank Forum was convened to discuss the evidence around food insecurity (FIS), its impact on health, and interventions which could make a difference both at individual and societal level, with a focus on the UK. This paper summarises the proceedings and recommendations. Speakers highlighted the growing issue of FIS due to current economic and social pressures. It was clear that the health implications of FIS varied geographically since food insecure women in higher income regions tend to be living with overweight or obesity, in contrast to those living in low-to-middle income countries. This paradox could be due to stress and/or metabolic or behavioural responses to an unpredictable food supply. The gut microbiota may play a role given the negative effects of low fibre diets on bacterial diversity, species balance and chronic disease risk. Solutions to FIS involve individual behavioural change, targeted services and societal/policy change. Obesity-related services are currently difficult to access. Whilst poverty is the root cause of FIS, it cannot be solved simply by making healthy food cheaper due to various ingrained beliefs, attitudes and behaviours in target groups. Person�centred models, such as Capability-Opportunity-Motivation Behavioural Change Techniques and Elicit-Provide-Elicit communication techniques are recommended. Societal change or improved resilience through psychological support may be more equitable ways to address FIS and can combine fiscal or food environment policies to shift purchasing towards healthier foods. However, policy implementation can be slow to enact due to the need for strong evidence, consultation and political will. Eradicating FIS must involve co-creation of interventions and policies to ensure that all stakeholders reach a consensus on solutions.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Nutrition and Health
ID Code:123614
Publisher:Cambridge University Press

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation