Khabbazbashi, N., Tavakoli, P.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0807-3709, García Ponce, E. and McCray, G.
(2026)
Unequal trajectories? An examination of L2 development in a higher education context in Mexico.
Applied Linguistics.
ISSN 1477-450X
doi: 10.1093/applin/amag016
(In Press)
Abstract/Summary
Understanding how second language (L2) proficiency develops in instructional settings remains a central concern within applied linguistics. This two-year longitudinal study examines English language development in a higher education context in Mexico, addressing key methodological and empirical gaps. We tracked L2 development—operationalised as changes in the TOEFL ITP® scores—across three time points and examined a wide range of variables, including the often-neglected factor of socio-economic status (SES). Results from linear mixed effects modelling and sensitivity analyses showed statistically significant, though small, gains in proficiency. Baseline proficiency emerged as a strong predictor of learning trajectories, with lower-proficiency students showing greater relative improvement. SES, contact with English, and age of onset were the most consistent predictors of L2 performance. Mediation analysis indicated that SES influences proficiency both directly and indirectly, primarily through contact with English. However, much of the SES effect remained unexplained, suggesting broader systemic influences. These findings shed light on hidden disparities in language education and offer insights for educational policy, highlighting the need to address structural barriers to equitable L2 development.
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128617 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1093/applin/amag016 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Literacy and Multilingualism (CeLM) Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Language and Applied Linguistics |
| Publisher | Oxford Journals |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download