1. Maddox E. Investigations on the relationship between convergence and accommodation of the eyes. J Anat. 1893;20:475-505, 65-84.
2. Hoyt C, Taylor D. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.
3. Rainey BB, Goss DA, Kidwell M, Feng B. Reliability of the response AC/A ratio determined using nearpoint autorefraction and simultaneous heterophoria measurement. Clin Exp Optom. 1998;81(5):185-92.
4. Havertape SA, Cruz OA, Miyazaki EA. Comparison of methods for determining the AC/A ratio in accommodative esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1999;36(4):178-83.
5. Murray C, Newsham D. Normative Values for the Accommodative Convergence to Accommodation Ratio (AC/A). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(5):801.
6. Pankhania SR, Firth AY. The response AC/A ratio: differences between inducing and relaxing accommodation at different distances of fixation. Strabismus. 2011;19(2):52-6.
7. Gage J. A comparison of AC/A ratio measurement using the gradient method at near and distance fixation. Brit Orthoptic J. 1996;53:25.
8. Jackson JH, Arnoldi K. The Gradient AC/A Ratio: What's Really Normal? Am Orthopt J. 2004;54:125-32.
9. Horwood A, Riddell P, Turner JE, Houston SM, editors. Assessment of the AC/A ratio using a remote haploscopic photorefractor. IX International Orthoptic Congress; 1999; Stockholm, Sweden: Berufsverband der Orthoptisten.
10. Turner JE, Horwood AM, Houston SM, Riddell PM. Development of the response AC/A ratio over the first year of life. Vision Res. 2002;42(22):2521-32.
11. Judge SJ. Can current models of accommodation and vergence control account for the discrepancies between AC/A measurements made by the fixation disparity and phoria methods? Vision Res. 1985;25(12):1999-2001.
12. Horwood A, Riddell P. The use of cues to convergence and accommodation in naïve, uninstructed participants. Vision Research. 2008;48(15):1613-24.
13. Ludden SM, Horwood AM, Riddell PM. Children’s Accommodation to a Variety of Targets – A Pilot Study. Strabismus. 2017;25(3):95-100.
14. Roberts TL, Manny RE, Benoit JS, Anderson HA. Impact of Cognitive Demand during Sustained Near Tasks in Children and Adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(3):223-33.
15. Horwood A, Riddell P. Differences between naïve and expert observers’ vergence and accommodative responses to a range of targets. Ophthalmic & Physiol Optics. 2010;30:152-9.
16. Horwood A, Riddell P. The Clinical Near Gradient Stimulus AC/A ratio correlates better with the response CA/C ratio than with the response AC/A ratio. Strabismus. 2013;21(2):140-4.
17. Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda KJ, Chen HW. Effect of age on the interaction between the AC/A and CA/C ratios. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15(5):451-5.
18. Horwood A, Riddell P. Hypo-accommodation responses in hypermetropic infants and children. BJOphth 2011;95( 2):231-7.
19. Horwood AM, Toor SS, Riddell PM. Change in convergence and accommodation after two weeks of eye exercises in typical young adults. J AAPOS. 2014;18(2):162-8.
20. Mollon JD, Bosten JM, Peterzell DH, Webster MA. Individual differences in visual science: What can be learned and what is good experimental practice? Vision Res. 2017;141:4-15.
21. Horwood AM, Riddell PM. Disparity-driven vs blur-driven models of accommodation and convergence in binocular vision and intermittent strabismus. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus {JAAPOS}. 2014;18(6):576-83.
22. Horwood A, Riddell P. Developmental changes in the balance of disparity, blur and looming/proximity cues to drive ocular alignment and focus. Perception. 2013;42:693-715.
23. Toor S, Horwood AM, Riddell P. Asymmetrical accommodation in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017; Oct 19. pii: bjophthalmol-2017-310282. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310282. [Epub ahead of print].