From dismissal to partnership: patient experiences of recurrent urinary tract infection healthcare informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Theory

[thumbnail of Barriers and facilitators manuscript (Health Exp) - revised clean.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
ยท Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Newlands, A. F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-0075, Kramer, M. L., Snuggs, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-9517 and Finlay, K. A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-2652 (2026) From dismissal to partnership: patient experiences of recurrent urinary tract infection healthcare informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Theory. Health Expectations. ISSN 1369-7625 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

Background: Recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) is common, debilitating, and associated with substantial negative impact on quality of life. Despite this, rUTI healthcare is often experienced as fragmented, dismissive, and poorly aligned with patient needs. Applying behavioural theory to systematically identify modifiable intervention targets offers a promising but unexplored approach to improving rUTI care. Objective: To explore patient experiences of rUTI healthcare in the UK, identify barriers to and facilitators of quality care, and generate theory-informed targets for behaviour-change intervention and service improvement. Design: Qualitative interview study using reflexive thematic analysis, followed by deductive mapping of themes to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (BCTT), and Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology (BCIO). Setting and participants: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with 26 adults living with rUTI in the UK, with the interview schedule informed by the TDF. Results: Four barrier themes revealed systematic challenges: 'Struggling with the System,' 'Unheard Voices,' 'Shouldering Blame,' and 'Forced to Become an Expert.' Together, these captured how diagnostic limitations, fragmented services, clinical dismissal, and individualised blame compel people living with rUTI into self-advocacy experienced as exhausting. Four facilitator themes demonstrated that quality care is achievable: 'Feeling Validated,' 'Partners in the Puzzle,' 'Continuity and Connection,' and 'Expanding the Toolkit.' All 14 TDF domains were implicated, most frequently 'social influences,' 'beliefs about consequences,' 'environmental context and resources,' and 'knowledge,' indicating improvement requires both system restructuring and interpersonal skill development. Mapping to BCT Taxonomy and BCIO identified specific intervention techniques targeting these domains. Conclusion: People living with rUTI face structural and relational challenges in healthcare that compound illness burden. When individuals feel believed, involved, and supported, rUTI healthcare experiences are transformed. By integrating reflexive thematic analysis with behavioural theory, this study demonstrates that improving rUTI care requires attention to both system-level factors such as diagnostic flexibility, service continuity, and treatment options, alongside relational factors, particularly validation and shared decision-making. These findings provide a theoretically grounded foundation for intervention development, with broader relevance for chronic conditions characterised by diagnostic uncertainty.

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/128522
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Pain Research
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Nutrition and Health
Uncontrolled Keywords Recurrent urinary tract infection; patient experience; healthcare quality; shared decision-making; patient-doctor communication; qualitative; behaviour change
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record