Advising under constraint: how think tank autonomy, collaboration, and ideology shape policy advice in Pakistan

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Abdul Ghaffar, F., Tsang, D., Hussain, F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4214-477X and Khan, R. (2026) Advising under constraint: how think tank autonomy, collaboration, and ideology shape policy advice in Pakistan. Cogent Social Sciences, 12 (1). 2664106. ISSN 2331-1886 doi: 10.1080/23311886.2026.2664106

Abstract/Summary

This study examines how think tank characteristics—capacity, autonomy, collaboration, and ideological orientation—shape the quality of policy advice in Pakistan, extending the Policy Advisory Systems (PAS) framework to developing contexts. Using content analysis of 50 policy documents from 11 think tanks (2020–2023), the study evaluates four dimensions of advice: substantiveness, specificity, long-term orientation, and goal alignment. A Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) assesses the effects of organisational attributes and government capacity, with ideology, autonomy, and collaboration treated as covariates. Findings show that autonomy significantly enhances substantive policy advice, while collaboration improves specificity and strategic focus. Ideological alignment strengthens policy relevance and coherence, particularly in politically fragmented settings. Although modest in effect, organisational capacity remains important for analytical credibility. In contrast, government capacity has limited influence on long-term advisory uptake, reflecting short-term political incentives and institutional inertia. The study highlights key reform priorities: strengthening analytical capacity, fostering cross-sector collaboration, ensuring ideological clarity, and safeguarding autonomy. These measures are essential for institutionalising evidence-informed policymaking in developing democracies. By applying PAS to a non-OECD context, the research contributes to comparative advisory systems literature and underscores the role of think tanks as knowledge brokers in constrained governance environments.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/129721
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/23311886.2026.2664106
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record