Accessibility navigation


The nutritional composition and impact on UK dietary intakes of meat and plant-based meat alternatives

Gouela, M., Stergiadis, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-182X and Clegg, M. (2025) The nutritional composition and impact on UK dietary intakes of meat and plant-based meat alternatives. npj Science of Food. ISSN 2396-8370 (In Press)

[thumbnail of Gouela et al. 2025_npjSF (Centaur).pdf] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

776kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Meat alternatives are designed to be used as like-for-like replacements for meat, however, meat is a source of key nutrients. Implications for impact on dietary intakes is unknown. Nutritional information on plant-based meat alternatives (n=475) and meat products (n=754) available in the UK was collected. The products were categorized into food type as per the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) and into sub-categories; meat (ME), plant-based (PB) and mycoprotein (MP). The NDNS data was used to calculate intake of meat products across age groups. PB and MP were then substituted for meat intakes, and energy and nutrient intakes calculated and compared to UK Dietary Reference Values. Price, fat, saturated fat, carbohydrate, sugar, protein, fibre, and energy were different between ME, MP and PB products (P<0.001), leading to changes in nutrient intakes. There was considerable variation between products categories, highlighting the impact of like-for-like replacements on nutrient intakes.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Animal Sciences
Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences > Human Nutrition Research Group
ID Code:124253
Publisher:Nature

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation