Bilingualism modulates functional connectivity induced by a domain-general artificial grammar learning task

1. Reber, A. S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 6, 855–863 (1967). 2. Conway, C. M., Baurnschmidt, A., Huang, S. & Pisoni, D. B. Implicit Statistical Learning in Language Processing: Word Predictability is the Key. Cognition 114, 356–371 (2010). 3. Misyak, J. B. & Christiansen, M. H. Statistical Learning and Language: An Individual Differences Study. Lang. Learn. 62, 302–331 (2012). 4. Lukács, Á. & Kemény, F. Domain-general sequence learning deficit in specific language impairment. Neuropsychology 28, 472–483 (2014). 5. Christiansen, M. H., Louise Kelly, M., Shillcock, R. C. & Greenfield, K. Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism. Cognition 116, 382–393 (2010). 6. Hedenius, M. et al. Impaired implicit sequence learning in children with developmental dyslexia. Res. Dev. Disabil. 34, 3924–3935 (2013). 7. Kaushanskaya, M. & Prior, A. Variability in the effects of bilingualism on cognition: It is not just about cognition, it is also about bilingualism. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 18, 27–28 (2015). 8. Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F. & Yang, S. Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 13, 525–531 (2010). 9. Oller, D. K., Pearson, B. Z. & Cobo-Lewis, A. B. Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Appl. Psycholinguist. 28, 191–230 (2007). 10. Pontikas, G., Cunnings, I. & Marinis, T. Sentence processing in bilingual children: Evidence from garden-path sentences. Linguist. Approaches Biling. 14, 476–511 (2024). 11. Bialystok, E. et al. Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: evidence from MEG. NeuroImage 24, 40–49 (2005). 12. Costa, A., Hernández, M. & Sebastián-Gallés, N. Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition 106, 59–86 (2008). 13. Sorge, G. B., Toplak, M. E. & Bialystok, E. Interactions between levels of attention ability and levels of bilingualism in children’s executive functioning. Dev. Sci. 20, e12408 (2017). 14. Luk, G., Sa, E. D. & Bialystok, E. Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Biling. Lang. Cogn. 14, 588–595 (2011). 15. Prior, A. & MacWhinney, B. A bilingual advantage in task switching. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 13, 253–262 (2010). 16. Kormi-Nouri, R., Moniri, S. & Nilsson, L.-G. Episodic and semantic memory in bilingual and monolingual children. Scand. J. Psychol. 44, 47–54 (2003). 17. Grundy, J. G. The effects of bilingualism on executive functions: an updated quantitative analysis. J. Cult. Cogn. Sci. 4, 177–199 (2020). 18. Paap, K. R. & Greenberg, Z. I. There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognit. Psychol. 66, 232–258 (2013). 19. Grey, S., Sanz, C., Morgan-Short, K. & Ullman, M. T. Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 21, 970–994 (2018). 20. Siu, T.-S. C. & Ho, S.-H. C. Investigating Effects of Bilingualism on Syntactic Processing: Testing Structural Sensitivity Theory. Lang. Learn. 72, 534–575 (2022). 21. Kuo, L.-J. & Anderson, R. C. Beyond Cross-Language Transfer: Reconceptualizing the Impact of Early Bilingualism on Phonological Awareness. Sci. Stud. Read. 14, 365–385 (2010). 22. Verhagen, J. & Bree, E. de. Effects of bilingualism on statistical learning in preschoolers. Linguist. Approaches Biling. 11, 611–639 (2021). 23. de Bree, E., Verhagen, J., Kerkhoff, A., Doedens, W. & Unsworth, S. Language learning from inconsistent input: Bilingual and monolingual toddlers compared. Infant Child Dev. 26, e1996 (2017). 24. Fitch, W. T. & Friederici, A. D. Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367, 1933–1955 (2012). 25. Beckers, G. J. L., Berwick, R. C., Okanoya, K. & Bolhuis, J. J. What do animals learn in artificial grammar studies? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 81, 238–246 (2017). 26. Schiff, R., Vakil, E., Gabay, Y. & Kahta, S. 36. Implicit learning in developmental dyslexia as demonstrated by the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) and the Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL) tasks. in Handbook of Communication Disorders: Theoretical, Empirical, and Applied Linguistic Perspectives (eds Dattner, E. & Ravid, D.) 753–764 (De Gruyter Mouton, 2018). doi:10.1515/9781614514909-037. 27. Tabatabaei, O. & Dehghani, M. Assessing the reliability of grammaticality judgment tests. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 31, 173–182 (2012). 28. Lindenmayer, A. Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development I. Filaments with one-sided inputs. J. Theor. Biol. 18, 280–299 (1968). 29. Culbertson, J. & Schuler, K. Artificial Language Learning in Children. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 5, 353–373 (2019). 30. Krivochen, D. G. From n-grams to trees in Lindenmayer systems. ArXiv210401363 Cs http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.01363 (2021). 31. Vender, M. et al. Disentangling sequential from hierarchical learning in Artificial Grammar Learning: Evidence from a modified Simon Task. PLOS ONE 15, e0232687 (2020). 32. Schmid, S., Saddy, D. & Franck, J. Finding Hierarchical Structure in Binary Sequences: Evidence from Lindenmayer Grammar Learning. Cogn. Sci. 47, e13242 (2023). 33. Vender, M., Krivochen, D. G., Phillips, B., Saddy, D. & Delfitto, D. Implicit Learning, Bilingualism, and Dyslexia: Insights From a Study Assessing AGL With a Modified Simon Task. Front. Psychol. 10, (2019). 34. Geambaşu, A., Ravignani, A. & Levelt, C. C. Preliminary Experiments on Human Sensitivity to Rhythmic Structure in a Grammar with Recursive Self-Similarity. Front. Neurosci. 10, (2016). 35. Geambaşu, A., Toron, L., Ravignani, A. & Levelt, C. C. Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task. Music Sci. 3, 2059204320946615 (2020). 36. Brennan, J. R. & Hale, J. T. Hierarchical structure guides rapid linguistic predictions during naturalistic listening. PLOS ONE 14, e0207741 (2019). 37. Luk, G., Sa, E. D. & Bialystok, E. Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Biling. Lang. Cogn. 14, 588–595 (2011). 38. Chen, L., Goucha, T., Männel, C., Friederici, A. D. & Zaccarella, E. Hierarchical syntactic processing is beyond mere associating: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence from a novel artificial grammar. Hum. Brain Mapp. 42, 3253–3268 (2021). 39. Jeon, H.-A. Hierarchical processing in the prefrontal cortex in a variety of cognitive domains. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8, (2014). 40. Uddén, J., de Jesus Dias Martins, M., Zuidema, W. & Tecumseh Fitch, W. Hierarchical Structure in Sequence Processing: How to Measure It and Determine Its Neural Implementation. Top. Cogn. Sci. 12, 910–924 (2020). 41. Hertrich, I., Dietrich, S. & Ackermann, H. The Margins of the Language Network in the Brain. Front. Commun. 5, (2020). 42. Friederici, A. D. Language in Our Brain: The Origins of a Uniquely Human Capacity. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2017). 43. Uddin, L. Q., Yeo, B. T. T. & Spreng, R. N. Towards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks. Brain Topogr. 32, 926–942 (2019). 44. Marek, S. & Dosenbach, N. U. F. Chapter 18 - Control networks of the frontal lobes. in Handbook of Clinical Neurology (eds D’Esposito, M. & Grafman, J. H.) vol. 163 333–347 (Elsevier, 2019). 45. Simon, J. R. & Wolf, J. D. Choice reaction time as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics 6, 99–105 (1963). 46. Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N. & Christiansen, M. H. Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 117–125 (2015). 47. Van de Cavey, J. & Hartsuiker, R. J. Is there a domain-general cognitive structuring system? Evidence from structural priming across music, math, action descriptions, and language. Cognition 146, 172–184 (2016). 48. Koelsch, S., Rohrmeier, M., Torrecuso, R. & Jentschke, S. Processing of hierarchical syntactic structure in music. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 15443–15448 (2013). 49. Kroll, J. F. & Bialystok, E. Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. J. Cogn. Psychol. 25, 497–514 (2013). 50. Luk, G., Anderson, J. A. E., Craik, F. I. M., Grady, C. & Bialystok, E. Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain Cogn. 74, 347–357 (2010). 51. Grundy, J. G., Anderson, J. A. E. & Bialystok, E. Neural correlates of cognitive processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1396, 183–201 (2017). 52. Thiele, J. A., Richter, A. & Hilger, K. Multimodal Brain Signal Complexity Predicts Human Intelligence. eNeuro 10, (2023). 53. van Noordt, S. & Willoughby, T. Cortical maturation from childhood to adolescence is reflected in resting state EEG signal complexity. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 48, 100945 (2021). 54. Grundy, J. G., Anderson, J. A. E. & Bialystok, E. Bilinguals have more complex EEG brain signals in occipital regions than monolinguals. NeuroImage 159, 280–288 (2017). 55. Bice, K., Yamasaki, B. L. & Prat, C. S. Bilingual Language Experience Shapes Resting-State Brain Rhythms. Neurobiol. Lang. 1, 288–318 (2020). 56. Abhang, P. A., Gawali, B. W. & Mehrotra, S. C. Chapter 3 - Technical Aspects of Brain Rhythms and Speech Parameters. in Introduction to EEG- and Speech-Based Emotion Recognition (eds Abhang, P. A., Gawali, B. W. & Mehrotra, S. C.) 51–79 (Academic Press, 2016). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-804490-2.00003-8. 57. Pereira Soares, S. M., Kubota, M., Rossi, E. & Rothman, J. Determinants of bilingualism predict dynamic changes in resting state EEG oscillations. Brain Lang. 223, 105030 (2021). 58. Pliatsikas, C., DeLuca, V. & Voits, T. The Many Shades of Bilingualism: Language Experiences Modulate Adaptations in Brain Structure. Lang. Learn. 70, 133–149 (2020). 59. Nuñez, A. & Buño, W. The Theta Rhythm of the Hippocampus: From Neuronal and Circuit Mechanisms to Behavior. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15, (2021). 60. Voits, T. et al. Degree of multilingual engagement modulates resting state oscillatory activity across the lifespan. Neurobiol. Aging 140, 70–80 (2024). 61. Finn, E. S. Is it time to put rest to rest? Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 1021–1032 (2021). 62. Kavcic, V., Daugherty, A. M. & Giordani, B. Post-task modulation of resting state EEG differentiates MCI patients from controls. Alzheimers Dement. Diagn. Assess. Dis. Monit. 13, e12153 (2021). 63. Wang, H., McIntosh, A. R., Kovacevic, N., Karachalios, M. & Protzner, A. B. Age-related Multiscale Changes in Brain Signal Variability in Pre-task versus Post-task Resting-state EEG. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 28, 971–984 (2016). 64. Wang, Z. et al. Changes in the brain intrinsic organization in both on-task state and post-task resting state. NeuroImage 62, 394–407 (2012). 65. Choe, A. S. et al. Reproducibility and Temporal Structure in Weekly Resting-State fMRI over a Period of 3.5 Years. PLOS ONE 10, e0140134 (2015). 66. Gonzalez-Castillo, J. et al. The spatial structure of resting state connectivity stability on the scale of minutes. Front. Neurosci. 8, (2014). 67. Lynch, L. K. et al. Task-evoked functional connectivity does not explain functional connectivity differences between rest and task conditions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 4939–4948 (2018). 68. Požar, R., Kero, K., Martin, T., Giordani, B. & Kavcic, V. Task aftereffect reorganization of resting state functional brain networks in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14, (2023). 69. Omidvarnia, A. et al. On the Spatial Distribution of Temporal Complexity in Resting State and Task Functional MRI. Entropy 24, 1148 (2022). 70. Lewis, C. M., Baldassarre, A., Committeri, G., Romani, G. L. & Corbetta, M. Learning sculpts the spontaneous activity of the resting human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 17558–17563 (2009). 71. Lor, C. S. et al. Pre- and post-task resting-state differs in clinical populations. NeuroImage Clin. 37, 103345 (2023). 72. Anderson, J. A. E., Mak, L., Keyvani Chahi, A. & Bialystok, E. The language and social background questionnaire: Assessing degree of bilingualism in a diverse population. Behav. Res. Methods 50, 250–263 (2018). 73. Pliatsikas, C. Understanding structural plasticity in the bilingual brain: The Dynamic Restructuring Model. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 23, 459–471 (2020). 74. Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, Second Edition. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2017). doi:10.1201/9781315370279. 75. Luk, G., Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M. & Grady, C. L. Lifelong Bilingualism Maintains White Matter Integrity in Older Adults. J. Neurosci. 31, 16808–16813 (2011). 76. Amalric, M. & Dehaene, S. A distinct cortical network for mathematical knowledge in the human brain. NeuroImage 189, 19–31 (2019). 77. Knops, A. & Willmes, K. Numerical ordering and symbolic arithmetic share frontal and parietal circuits in the right hemisphere. NeuroImage 84, 786–795 (2014). 78. d’Acremont, M., Fornari, E. & Bossaerts, P. Activity in Inferior Parietal and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Signals the Accumulation of Evidence in a Probability Learning Task. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002895 (2013). 79. Agosta, S. et al. The Pivotal Role of the Right Parietal Lobe in Temporal Attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29, 805–815 (2017). 80. Berroir, P. et al. Interference control at the response level: Functional networks reveal higher efficiency in the bilingual brain. J. Neurolinguistics 43, 4–16 (2017). 81. Braga, R. M., DiNicola, L. M., Becker, H. C. & Buckner, R. L. Situating the left-lateralized language network in the broader organization of multiple specialized large-scale distributed networks. J. Neurophysiol. 124, 1415–1448 (2020). 82. Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C. & Hoshino, N. Two languages in mind: Bilingualism as a tool to investigate language, cognition, and the brain. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 159–163 (2014). 83. Green, D. W. & Abutalebi, J. Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. J. Cogn. Psychol. 25, 515–530 (2013). 84. Pliatsikas, C., Antoniou, M., Duñabeitia, J. A. & Calabria, M. A comprehensive protocol to study the effects of multilingualism on cognition and the brain in patients with progressive neurological diseases. MethodsX 14, 103343 (2025). 85. Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N. & Evershed, J. K. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behav. Res. Methods 52, 388–407 (2020). 86. Sheehan, A., Saddy, D., Gupta, S. & Pliatsikas, C. The impact of bilingual experience on task-driven resting-state functional connectivity in the language and attentional cognitive domains. Preprint at https://osf.io/ghu7f_v1 (2025). 87. Brain Products GmbH. ActiCAP snap (32-channel), ControlBox, BrainAmp [Apparatus]. Brain Products GmbH (2016). 88. Psychology Software Tools. E-Prime 3.0 software. Psychology Software Tools (2016). 89. Brain Products GmbH. BrainVision Recorder [Software]. Brain Products GmbH (2021). 90. Delorme, A. & Makeig, S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9–21 (2004). 91. Dong, L. et al. MATLAB Toolboxes for Reference Electrode Standardization Technique (REST) of Scalp EEG. Front. Neurosci. 11, (2017). 92. Brain Products GmbH. BrainVision Analyzer [Software]. Brain Products GmbH (2021). 93. Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Pantazis, D. & Leahy, R. M. Brainstorm: A user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, (2011). 94. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2013). 95. RStudio. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio PBC (2022). 96. American Psychological Association Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/task-force-2006.pdf (2007). 97. Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19, 716–723 (1974). 98. Simpson, G. L. gratia: Graceful ggplot-Based Graphics and Other Functions for GAMs Fitted using mgcv. (2024).