Plant-based vs. Omnivore diets for athletic performance outcomes among recreational athletes in university dining halls: a randomized crossover study

[thumbnail of Revised_Nutrition Journal_SWAP MEAT Multi Site (2).docx]
Text
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Raygoza, C., Roberts, A., Guidetti, A., Cai, O., Sangowdar, P., Muriuki, E. N., Laverick-Johnson, H., Sanguinetti, G., Smith, E., Fammartino, A., Robinson, J., Lee, E., Policastro, P., Mills, C., Kuhnle, G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-8931, Svennevik, E. and Gardner, C. (2026) Plant-based vs. Omnivore diets for athletic performance outcomes among recreational athletes in university dining halls: a randomized crossover study. Nutrition Journal, 25. 42. ISSN 1475-2891 doi: 10.1186/s12937-026-01290-1

Abstract/Summary

Background Some research suggests that transitioning from an omnivorous to a plant-based diet does not significantly change athletic performance for endurance or resistance athletes, implying comparability to animal-based diets for athletic goals. However, there is a relative paucity of these studies and widespread social media misinformation suggesting insufficient calorie, protein, and micronutrient intake of plant-based diets to meet the demands of athletic performance. This multi-site study, conducted in collaboration with the Menus of Change University Research Collaborative (MCURC), investigates the impact of plant-based diets in several university dining halls on athletic performance among recreational athletes. Methods In this crossover study, recreational runners and resistance trainers were recruited from four universities: Stanford, Rutgers, Vanderbilt, and the University of Reading (n = 36; runners = 16, resistance trainers = 20). Participants were assigned to complete two 4-week diet interventions, Omnivore and Plant-based, in random order. Primary outcomes for runners (12-minute timed run) and resistance trainers (3-rep maximum test for chest press, lat pulldown, and leg press) were collected at baseline and after each diet. Paired t-tests and linear regression models were used to compare performance between diets. Results Mean differences between Omnivore and Plant-based diets in 12-minute timed run (− 36.2 m; 95% CI: -130.3 to 57.9 m; p = 0.43) and composite machine strength (− 4.0%; 95% CI: − 8.5 to 0.6%; p = 0.08) were not significant. Conclusion Recreational runners and resistance trainers may be able to adopt a plant-based diet without significant changes in athletic performance. These findings can support universities in offering plant-based food options for recreational athletes in dining halls.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/130645
Identification Number/DOI 10.1186/s12937-026-01290-1
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences > Human Nutrition Research Group
Publisher BioMed Central
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record