Advancing digital nutrition assessment: development and evaluation of the UK eNutriFFQv2.0

Weech, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1738-877X, Fallaize, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-6489, Zenun Franco, R., Sutton, R., Fotiou, M., Robertson, N., Hwang, F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-3869 and Lovegrove, J. A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-9455 (2026) Advancing digital nutrition assessment: development and evaluation of the UK eNutriFFQv2.0. Nutrition, 149. 113212. ISSN 1873-1244 doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2026.113212

Abstract/Summary

Background: Digital dietary assessment tools are highly beneficial for nutrition research and personalized interventions. Objective: This paper describes the development and evaluation of eNutriFFQv2.0, an updated online food frequency questionnaire designed to reflect current diets in the United Kingdom (UK). Updates included modernized food lists based on recent UK population surveys, food composition tables, and food portion photos to improve accuracy and user experience. Methods: To assess reproducibility, UK adults completed the FFQ twice, 14 days apart; validity was evaluated against a 3-d weighed food record in a sub-sample. Multiple statistical methods were used. After excluding participants with unfeasible energy intakes, 87 participants completed the reproducibility and 53 the evaluation. Results: The final eNutriFFQv2.0 captured 164 items and estimated intake for 56 nutrients and 6 food groups. Agreement with the WFR was acceptable to good for 25 out of the 29 nutrients analyzed (weighted kappa 0.21–0.77), with ≤10% misclassification into opposite quartiles for most nutrients. Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement for energy (176 kcal/d higher in FFQ1) and macronutrient estimates. Reproducibility was good for 24 out of the 29 nutrients analyzed (weighted kappa 0.58–0.85) with <5% misclassification. Mean bias for estimates of carbohydrate, fat, and protein was small (0.0–0.7). Energy estimates were 209 kcal/d (10.7%) higher in the first compared with the second completion of the FFQ. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that eNutriFFQv2.0 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nutrient intake in UK adults, offering a practical, scalable solution for research and public health in the context of digital health and personalized dietary interventions.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/129496
Identification Number/DOI	10.1016/j.nut.2026.113212
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Biomedical Sciences Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences > Human Nutrition Research Group
Publisher	Elsevier
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item