• German JB, Zivkovic AM, Dallas DC, Smilowitz JT: Nutrigenomics and personalized diets: what will they mean for food?; in Doyle MP, Klaenhammer TR (eds):Annual Review of Food Science and Technology.PaloAlto, Annual Reviews,2011, vol2,pp97–123. • Bouchard C, Ordovas JM: Fundamentals of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2012; 108: 1–15. • Joost HG, Gibney MJ, Cashman KD, Görman U, Hesketh JE, Mueller M, van Ommen B, Williams CM, Mathers JC: Personalised nutrition: status and perspectives.Br J Nutr 2007; 98: 26–31. • de Roos B: Personalised nutrition: ready for practice? Proc Nutr Soc 2013; 72: 48–52. • Little J, Hawken S: On track? Using the human genome epidemiology roadmap. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 256–266. • Fenech M, El-Sohemy A, Cahill L, Ferguson LR, French TAC, Tai ES, Milner J, Koh WP, Xie L, Zucker M, Buckley M, Cosgrove L, Lockett T, Fung KYC, Head R:Nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics: viewpoints onthecurrent status and applicationsinnutrition research and practice. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics 2011; 4: 69–89. • García-Cañas V, Simó C, León C, Cifuentes A: Advances in nutrigenomics research: novel and future analytical approaches to investigate the biological activity of natural compounds and food functions.J Pharm Biomed Anal 2010;51: 290–34 • Astley SB, Elliott RM: The european nutrigenomics organisation: linking genomics, nutrition and health research. J Sci Food Agric 2007; 87: 1180–1184. • Kussmann M, Fay LB: Nutrigenomics and personalized nutrition: science and concept. Pers Med 2008; 5: 447–455. • Mutch DM, Wahli W, Williamson G: Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics: the emerging faces of nutrition. FASEB J 2005; 19: 1602–1616. • Farhud DD, Zarif Yeganeh M, Zarif Yeganeh M: Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics. Iran J Public Health 2010; 39: 1–14. • Gibney MJ, Walsh MC: The future direction of personalised nutrition: my diet, my phenotype, my genes. Proc Nutr Soc 2013; 72: 219–225. • Boland M: Innovation in the food industry: personalised nutrition and mass customisation. Innov-Manag Policy P 2008; 10: 53–60. • Rimbach G, Minihane AM: Nutrigenetics and personalised nutrition: how far have we progressed and are we likely to get there? Proc Nutr Soc 2009; 68: 162–172. • Simonson I: Determinants of customers’ responses to customized offers: conceptual framework and research propositions. J Mark 2005; 69: 32–45. • Fan HY, Poole MS: What is personalization? Perspectives on the design and implementation of personalization in information systems. J Organ Comp Electron Commer 2006; 16: 179–202. • Wu CHJ: A re-examination of the antecedents and impact of customer participation in service. Serv Ind J 2011; 31: 863–876. • Sunikka A, Bragge J: What, who and where: insights into personalization. Proc. 41st Annu Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, 2008. • Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM, Berezowska A, Goossens J: Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model? Genes Nutr 2013; 8: 153–163. • Goddard KAB, Robitaille J, Dowling NF, Parrado AR, Fishman J, Bradley LA, Moored CA, Khoury MJ: Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices relatedto internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis. Public Health Genomics 2009; 12: 92–104. • Ahlgren J, Nordgren A, Perrudin M, Ronteltap A, Savigny J, Trijp H, Nordström K, Görman U: Consumers on the internet: ethical and legal aspects of commercialization of personalized nutrition. Genes Nutr 2013; 8: 349–355 • van Trijp JCM, Ronteltap A: A marketing and consumer behaviour perspective on personalised nutrition; in Kok FJ, Bouwman L, Desiere F (eds): Personalized Nutrition: Principles and Applications.Boca Raton,CRC Press,2007, pp 185–204. • Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BCY, Agarwal R: The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. J Manage Inform Syst 2009; 26: 135–173. • Li T, Unger T: Willing to pay for quality personalization? Trade-off between quality and privacy. Eur J Inform Syst 2012; 21: 621–642. • Li H, Sarathy R, Xu H: Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus. J Comput Inf Syst 2010; 51: 62–71. • Pavlou PA: State of the information privacy literature: where are we now and where should we go? Miss Quart 2011; 35: 977–988. • Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H: Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. Miss Quart 2011; 35: 989–1015. • Anderson CL, Agarwal R: The digitization of healthcare: boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inf Syst Res 2011; 22: 469–490. • Oliver JM, Slashinski MJ, Wang T, Kelly PA, Hilsenbeck SG, McGuire AL: Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants’ perspectives. Public Health Genomics 2012; 15:106–114. • Wendel S, Dellaert BGC, Ronteltap A, van Trijp HCM: Consumers’ intention to use health recommendation systems to receive personalized nutrition advice. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 126. • Li Y: Theories in online information privacy research: a critical review and an integrated framework. Decis Support Syst 2012; 54: 471–481. • Xie E, Teo H-H, Wan W: Volunteering personal information on the internet: effects of reputation, privacy notices, and rewards on online consumer behavior. Market Lett 2006; 17: 61–74. • Eurostat: Statistics explained: population structure and ageing. European Commission 2011, 2012. • Eurostat: Statistics explained: overweight and obesity – BMI statistics. European Commission 2011, 2012. • Commission of the European Communities: Together for health: a strategic approach for the EU 2008–2013. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities, 2007. • Brislin RW: Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cult Psychol 1970; 1:185–216. • Taylor CW: The study of behavior – Q-technique and its methodology (book review). Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 400–401. • Pavlidis C, Karamitri A, Barakou A, Cooper DN, Poulas K, Topouzis S, Patrinos GP: Ascertainment and critical assessment of the views of the general public and healthcare professionals on nutrigenomics in Greece. PersMed 2012; 9: 201–210. • Adámková V, Veleminský M, Zimmelová P, Hubácek JA: Volunteer’s willingness to genetic testing – lack of the understanding of the matter. Physiol Res 2009; 58(suppl 1):S53–S54. • Sanderson S, Diefenbach M, Streicher S, Jabs E, Smirnoff M, Horowitz C, Zinberg R, Clesca C, Richardson L: Genetic and lifestyle causal beliefs about obesity and associated diseases among ethnically diverse patients:a structured interview study. Public Health Genomics 2013; 16: 83–93. • Bloss CS, Ornowski L, Silver E, Cargill M, Vanier V, Schork NJ, Topol EJ: Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments. Genet Med 2010; 12: 556–566. • Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O’Connor A, Skirton H: Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20: 811–816. • Heeney C, Hawkins N, de Vries J, Boddington P, Kaye J: Assessing the privacy risks of data sharing in genomics. Public Health Genomics 2011; 14: 17–25. • Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM, Renes RJ: Consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalised nutrition. Br J Nutr 2009; 101: 132–144. • Nielsen DE, El-Sohemy A: A randomized trial of genetic information for personalized nutrition. Genes Nutr 2012; 7: 559–566. • Stewart-Knox BJ, Bunting BP, Gilpin S, Parr HJ, Pinhão S, Strain JJ, de Almeida MDV, Gibney M: Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of Europeanconsumers.Br J Nutr2009; 101: 982–989. • Tan Y-H, Thoen W: Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. Int J Electron Comm 2001; 5: 61–74. • Belanger F, Carter L: Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J Strategic Inf Syst 2008;17: 165–176. • Green DT, Pearson JM: Integrating website usability with the electronic commerce acceptance model. Behav Inf Technol 2011; 30: 181–199. • Kim DJ, Ferrin DL, Rao HR: A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decis Support Syst 2008; 44: 544–564. • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manage Rev 1995; 20: 709–734. • Colquitt JA, Scott BA, LePine JA: Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J Appl Psychol 2007; 92:909–927. • Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, Voss H, Wynn R: European citizens’ use of e-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 2007;0.328472222222222 • Nissen N, Schunder-Tatzber S, Weidenhammer W, Johannessen H: What attitudes and needs do citizens in europe have in relation to complementary and alternative medicine? Forsch Komplementmed 2012; 19(suppl2):9–17. • Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW: Trust and tam in online shopping: an integrated model. Miss Quart 2003; 27: 51–90. • Stewart-Knox B, Kuznesof S, Robinson J, Rankin A, Orr K, Duffy M, Poínhos R, de Almeida MDV, Macready A, Gallagher C, Berezowska A, Fischer ARH, Navas-Carretero S, Riemer M, Traczyk I, GjelstadIMF, Mavrogianni C,Frewer LJ: Factors influencing European consumer uptake of personalised nutrition. Results of a qualitative analysis. Appetite 2013; 66: 67–74. • Dellande S, Gilly MC, Graham JL: Gaining compliance and losing weight: the role of the service provider in health care services. J Mark 2004; 68: 78–91. • Teixeira PJ, Silva MN, Mata J, Palmeira AL, Markland D: Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012; 9: 22. • UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2012), ‘International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011.’ Montreal.