Reproducibility of the online Food4Me food-frequency questionnaire for estimating dietary intakes across Europe
Marshall, S. J., Livingstone, K. M., Celis-Morales, C., Forster, H., Fallaize, R., O’Donovan, C. B., Woolhead, C., Marsaux, C. F. M., Macready, A. L.  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0368-9336, Navas-Carretero, S., San-Cristobal, R., Kolossa, S., Tsirigoti, L., Lambrinou, C. P., Moschonis, G., Godlewska, M., Surwillo, A., Drevon, C. A., Manios, Y., Traczyk, I. et al, Martınez, J. A., Saris, W. H. M., Daniel, H., Gibney, E. R., Brennan, L., Walsh, M. C., Lovegrove, J. A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-9455, Gibney, M. and Mathers, J. C.
(2016)
Reproducibility of the online Food4Me food-frequency questionnaire for estimating dietary intakes across Europe.
Journal of Nutrition, 146 (5).
pp. 1068-1075.
ISSN 0022-3166
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.3945/jn.115.225078 Abstract/SummaryBackground: Accurate dietary assessment is key to understanding nutrition-related outcomes and is essential for estimating dietary change in nutrition-based interventions. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the pan-European reproducibility of the Food4Me food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in assessing the habitual diet of adults. Methods: Participants from the Food4Me study, a 6-mo,Internet-based, randomized controlled trial of personalized nutrition conducted in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Spain, Netherlands, Germany, Greece, and Poland were included. Screening and baseline data (both collected before commencement of the intervention) were used in the present analyses, and participants were included only if they completed FFQs at screening and at baseline within a 1-mo timeframe before the commencement of the intervention. Sociodemographic (e.g., sex and country) and lifestyle[e.g.,bodymass index(BMI,inkg/m2)and physical activity] characteristics were collected. Linear regression, correlation coefficients, concordance (percentage) in quartile classification, and Bland-Altman plots for daily intakes were used to assess reproducibility. Results: In total, 567 participants (59% female), with a mean 6 SD age of 38.7 6 13.4 y and BMI of 25.4 6 4.8, completed both FFQs within 1 mo(mean 6 SD: 19.26 6.2d).Exact plus adjacent classification of total energy intake in participants was highest in Ireland (94%) and lowest in Poland (81%). Spearman correlation coefficients (r) in total energy intake between FFQs ranged from 0.50 for obese participants to 0.68 and 0.60 in normal-weight and overweight participants, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed a mean difference between FFQs of 210 kcal/d, with the agreement deteriorating as energy intakes increased. There was little variation in reproducibility of total energy intakes between sex and age groups. Conclusions: The online Food4Me FFQ was shown to be reproducible across 7 European countries when administered within a 1-mo period to a large number of participants. The results support the utility of the online Food4Me FFQ as a reproducible tool across multiple European populations. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01530139.
Downloads per month over past year
| Funders: |
European Commission
| The sponsoring bodies who contributed funding for the creation of this item.
Example: NERC
Example: The Royal Society of Chemistry
A pick list of funders may appear as you type in the funder's name in full or as an acronym. Select a correct match to complete the field or type in a new entry in full. For new entries, the full name is preferred. |
|---|
| Projects: |
Food4Me
Funded by:
European Commission
(FP7-KBBE-2010-4 265494 - £321,916)
Local Lead (PI): Julie Lovegrove
1 April 2011 - 31 March 2015
| Click Add to select your project (received at Reading) from an autocomplete list. |
|---|
| Date Deposited: | 25 Apr 2016 12:19 | Date item deposited into CentAUR |
|---|
| Last Modified: | 09 Jun 2024 04:23 | Date item last modified |
|---|
1. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, Adams C, Alleyne G, Asaria P, Baugh V, Bekedam H, Billo N, Casswell S, et al. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. Lancet 2011;377:1438–47.
2. Adamson AJ, Mathers JC. Effecting dietary change. Proc Nutr Soc 2004;63:537–47.
3. Dhurandhar NV, Schoeller D, Brown AW, Heymsfield SB, Thomas D, Sorensen TI, Speakman JR, Jeansonne M, Allison DB. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015;39:1109–13.
4. Boushey C, Coulston AM. Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of disease. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2008.
5. Subar AF. Developing dietary assessment tools. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:769–70.
6. Miniwatts Marketing Group. World Internet usage and population statistics [cited 2015 Apr 11]. Available from: http://www.internet-worldstats.com/stats.htm.
7. Steele RM, Mummery WK, Dwyer T. A comparison of face-to-face or Internet-delivered physical activity intervention on targeted determi-nants. Health Educ Behav 2009;36:1051–64.
8. Fernandez-Ballarth JD, Lluis Pinol J, Zazpe I, Corella D, Carrasco P, Toledo E, Perez-Bauer M, Angel Martinez-Gonzalez M, Salas-Salvado J, Martin-Moreno JM. Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire in an elderly Mediterranean population of Spain. Br J Nutr 2010;103:1808–16.
9. Marks GC, Hughes MC, van der Pols JC. Relative validity of food intake estimates using a food frequency questionnaire is associated with sex, age, and other personal characteristics. J Nutr 2006;136:459–65.
10. Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, Bingham S, Schoeller DA, Troiano RP, Freedman LS. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based observing protein and energy nutrition (open) study. Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32:1054–62.
11. Fallaize R, Forster H, Macready AL, Walsh MC, Mathers JC, Brennan L, Gibney ER, Gibney MJ, Lovegrove JA. Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e190.
12. Forster H, Fallaize R, Gallagher C, O’Donovan CB, Woolhead C, Walsh MC, Macready AL, Lovegrove JA, Mathers JC, Gibney MJ, et al. Online dietary intake estimation: the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e150.
13. Food4Me. An integrated analysis of opportunities and challenges for personalised nutrition [cited 2015 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.food4me.org/.
14. Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CFM, Forster H, O’Donovan CB, Woolhead C, Macready AL, Fallaize R, Navas-Carretero S, San-Cristobal R, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries. Genes Nutr 2015;10:450.
15. Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A, Cassidy A, Runswick SA, Oakes S, Lubin R, Thurnham DI, Key TJA, Roe L, et al. Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of epic using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin c and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26: S137–51.
16. Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, Warm D. Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires—a review. Public Health Nutr 2002;5:567–87.
17. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. [Internet] London: The Stationery Office; 2011; Dietary reference values for energy 2011 [cited 2016 Feb 19]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/339317/
SACN_Dietary_Reference_Values_for_Energy.pdf.
18. Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;65:1220S–8S.
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
20. Henry CJK. Basal metabolic rate studies in humans: measurement and development of new equations. Public Health Nutr 2005;8:1133–52.
21. Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, Prentice AM. Critical-evaluation of energy-intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cutoff limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr 1991;45:569–81.
22. Hebert JR, Peterson KE, Hurley TG, Stoddard AM, Cohen N, Field AE, Sorensen G. The effect of social desirability trait on self-reported dietary measures among multi-ethnic female health center employees. Ann Epidemiol 2001;11:417–27.
23. Vereecken CA, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Maes L, Grp HS. The Helena online food frequency questionnaire: reproducibility and comparison with four 24-h recalls in Belgian-Flemish adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010;64:541–8.
24. Johansson L, Solvoll K, Opdahl S, Bjorneboe GEA, Drevon CA. Response rates with different distribution methods and reward, and reproducibility of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997;51:346–53.
25. Beasley JM, Davis A, Riley WT. Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire. Public Health Nutr 2009;12:651–9.
26. Tsubono Y, Nishino Y, Fukao A, Hisamichi S, Tsugane S. Temporal change in the reproducibility of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:1231–5.
27. Filippi AR, Amodio E, Napoli G, Breda J, Bianco A, Jemni M, Censi L, Mammina C, Tabacchi G. The web-based ASSO-food frequency questionnaire for adolescents: relative and absolute reproducibility assessment. Nutr J 2014;13:119.
28. Labonte ME, Cyr A, Baril-Gravel L, Royer MM, Lamarche B. Validity and reproducibility of a web-based, self-administered food frequency questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012;66:166–73.
29. Nurul-Fadhilah A, Teo PS, Foo LH. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for dietary assessment in Malay adolescents in Malaysia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2012;21:97–103.
30. Chen CM, Huang Z-P, Zhang X, He L, Willett W, Wang J-L, Hasegawa K, Chen J-S. Reproducibility and validity of a Chinese food frequency questionnaire. Biomed Environ Sci 2010;23:1–3.
31. Wong JE, Parnell WR, Black KE, Skidmore PML. Reliability and relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess food group intakes in New Zealand adolescents. Nutr J 2012;11:65.
32. Sarmento RA, Antonio JP, Riboldi BP, Montenegro KR, Friedman R, de Azevedo MJ, de Almeida JC. Reproducibility and validity of a quantitative FFQ designed for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from southern Brazil. Public Health Nutr 2014;17:2237–45.
33. Kesse-Guyot E, Castetbon K, Touvier M, Hercberg S, Galan P. Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire designed for French adults. Ann Nutr Metab 2010;57:153–62.
34. Johansson L, Solvoll K, Bjorneboe GEA, Drevon CA. Under- and overreporting of energy intake related to weight status and lifestyle in a nationwide sample. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68:266–74.
35. Pfrimer K, Vilela M, Resende CM, Scagliusi FB, Marchini JS, Lima NKC, Moriguti JC, Ferriolli E. Under-reporting of food intake and body fatness in independent older people: a doubly labelled water study. Age Ageing 2015;44:103–8.
36. Lutomski JE, van den Broeck J, Harrington J, Shiely F, Perry IJ. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, mental health and dietary factors associated with direction of misreporting of energy intake. Public Health Nutr 2011;14:532–41. University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |
Lists
Lists
